Every couple of days it seems there is an economic release which triggers a change of sentiment. As a consequence of the drop in the base rate and a fall in commodity prices, inflation has fallen from 5.2% in September to 4.5% in October - the biggest drop in 16 yrs! Despite the drop, the rate is still well above the BoE's 2% target.
So is this good or bad news?
A few months ago, inflation was the main concern for the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC). Inflation was above the 2% target and the pressure was on the MPC to curb the rise in prices. The problem was that the economic outlook was also bleak so there were two separate forces pulling the committee. Preceding the minutes of the MPC's interest rate decision meeting published today, Tim Besley (a member of the committee) cited that "the outlook for inflation had changed dramatically between August and the rate cut in early November. "
The rate cut was a tool to encourage consumer spending and to lower the cost of borrowing. The effect of this (if it works) is inflation. But the problem is that people are not spending money - despite the rate cut people would rather save because there is no short term confidence. Add that to falling commodity prices and we have a new buzz word - deflation.
Deflation in the short term is a not necessarily a bad thing - prices fall which encourages people to spend. The knock on effect into the medium term however, is dangerous. In prolonged periods of deflation, consumers hold off buying goods, reckoning they will be cheaper later. This can lead to further falls in demand and output. As firms sell less, they respond by cutting jobs or cutting wages. Overall, consumers then have less money to spend - and demand falls yet again. And the spiral continues....
What this means is that we can expect further cuts from the BoE in the next few months as they try to avoid deflationary pressures. Good news for borrowers, terrible news for savers.
The key point I would like to note is how the BoE's sentiment has changed so quickly. One second inflation is the worry, they react (quite late I must add...a criticism which has been frequently aimed towards the MPC) and now deflation is the worry. It strikes me that the mandate which gives the BoE monetary control over inflation is nothing but a political tool.
Controlling inflation through interest rates is virtually impossible in the UK because we are so reliant on imports. The UK runs on a current account deficit - we import more than we export - and the cost of imports is determined by the cost of inputs (raw materials, labour etc) in the exporting country and the relative strength of the importing currency. The pound is weakening so the cost of importing has gone up so we should be seeing inflation. However, the the cost of raw materials is decreasing, which suggests deflation. So the overall effect is determined by these offsetting factors.
We are seeing falling inflation due to the culmination of decreased consumer spending caused by the bleak economic outlook which suggests that the fall in the price of raw materials is greater than the pound has devalued (arguable point). What I predict will happen is that we will see the fall in inflation overshoot into deflation for one simple reason - the MPC are reactionary. They act to and not in anticipation of the future economic climate. Some may even argue that their goal of controlling inflation is redundant since there are so many externalities involved that their weapon of choice namely interest rates, is not influential enough to make a difference.
I can see the reasoning behind both schools of thought. My opinion is that, regardless of which one you agree with, expecting the MPC to control inflation is an absolute joke!
FTSE......
And another great call if I do say so myself!
FTSE hit 4075 mark early on Tuesday morning before retracing back to 4200 mark. Was trading in that channel for a while until falling heavily today. As I write this, it has fallen below the 4075 mark with next support at 3945. I expect a retrace back to 4075 where another shorting opportunity may arise.
Google Search
Custom Search
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
So who should control the rates??
ReplyDeleteThe financial markets? Have it all based off libor (like the "real" economy) ?
Sounds like your blog reckons we are heading for another Japan? Is there nothing that can be learnt from them to stop this? Or maybe it is the place to be?? Apparently the Japanese are all rich...... as inflation doesnt erode the value of money....
Just a small point, but the writer decided to use a question mark in this title. However, he didn't in the last blog he posted. All I'm asking for is a little consistency. Just a tad. What, at the beginning of a sentence, inplies that a question is being asked. Therefore a question mark is required.
ReplyDeleteWhat is a FTSE? This sentence correctly employs the question mark.
What is a hedge fund. This sentence doesn't.
Economics he may have studied. English he didn't.
I agree with the last comment. The question mark is a beautiful symbol and should be treated with respect and adoration. My mother would turn in his grave if he saw a question posed without the beloved mark. Here here, Mr. Anonymous. By the way, I like your name.
ReplyDeleteIf, and this is a big if, I wrote a question down and didn't use a questsion mark, I'd be sacked. This Tysona woman should be too. Has anyone else noticed that she's bald?
ReplyDeleteIn order to post that last comment, I was made to type in the word 'Urea' as word verification.
ReplyDeleteIt was 'Wordsato' this time.
ReplyDeleteLinguistically, the word commodity came into use in English in the 15th century, derived from the French word "commodité", similar in meaning to "convenience" in terms of quality of services. The Latin root meaning is commoditas, referring variously to the appropriate measure of something; a fitting state, time or condition; a good quality; efficaciousness or propriety; and advantage, or benefit. The German equivalent is die Ware, i.e., wares or goods offered for sale. The French equivalent is "produit de base" or "matière première" like energy, goods, or industrial raw materials.
ReplyDeleteMr. Anonymous
Hedge Fund Maestro
Thanks for your input Mr. Anonymous!
ReplyDeleteIn relation to the first comment - yes I do see the possibility that the UK could follow what happened in Japan and suffer a long period of stagnation. The saving grace is that we are able to learn from their experience.
I don't think that we would want to follow the Japanese experience though. Growth in Japan throughout the 1990s was slower than growth in other major industrial nations largely due to the Bank of Japan's failure to cut interest rates quickly enough to counter after-effects of over-investment during the 1980s. The Bank of Japan failed to cut rates quickly enough (some argue the same mistake was made by the BoE) and Japan entered a liquidity trap. A combination of this and government policies led Japan into deflation.
The major difference between here and Japan - Japan has a world-leading export market, which probably is the main reason behind their wealth. Without such a base here, we could fall into a dangerous trap.
About your point on rate setting - I think the BoE base rate is an arbitrary measurement. It is claimed that the rate is tool to maintain price stability - I would argue that it is reactionary and fails to deal with present day economic issues. The MPC should in theory work off LIBOR since it determines the rates at which banks lend to each other and hence the rates which banks offer on savings and loans. This was emphasised recently when the spread between the base rate and LIBOR widened and the MPC were powerless to force banks to lower rates to spark lending.